Happy Sunday, GoldBuzzers!

It's been a rough six months since the January highs, and I've had more reader emails about this drawdown than any topic since we launched. So this week I went back to the raw data, 55 years of daily prices, and measured every significant drawdown inside the 1970s and 2000s bull markets.

Then a hedge fund story broke on Thursday that turned out to be the perfect context.

Let’s get into it.

The Scoreboard 🏆

Gold ended Friday around $4,040 an ounce, giving back ground as the dollar bounced off a one-month low. Even so, the metal managed a 0.3 percent gain in July, its first up month since February!

Softer US inflation data and the Fed's decision to hold rates steady did the heavy lifting, though markets still see roughly a 65 percent chance of a September hike, and that kept a lid on the rally.

Chair Kevin Warsh repeated the Fed's commitment to lowering inflation without hinting a hike is coming, but the three officials who dissented this week said again on Friday that more tightening is needed. Silver had a rougher ride, dropping more than two percent to $57.65 and closing July in the red. That's typical, since silver tends to swing much harder than gold in both directions.

Behind it all sits the US-Iran conflict from late February, which keeps oil prices and inflation worries elevated, and rate expectations with them.

Deep Dive 🔍

Gold’s down 28 percent and a $45 billion fund just imploded. Only one of those had to hurt.

Last Monday, Leopold Aschenbrenner was running one of the hottest hedge funds on the planet. The 24-year-old former OpenAI researcher had turned his AI thesis into a fund that peaked at a reported $45 billion, up 439 percent for the year through June. By Thursday, he'd sold his entire portfolio of public stocks to Ken Griffin's Citadel at a discount, forced out by margin calls after a 67 percent loss in July.

Notice what didn't cause this. It wasn’t that the AI story died last month, and his thesis may still prove correct over the years ahead. What took him down was borrowed money. Reports put the fund's leverage as high as 400 percent, and leverage means you don't get to wait out a drawdown. Your lenders decide when you sell, and they always decide at the worst possible moment. An unleveraged investor holding the same stocks would be sitting on losses today. Aschenbrenner is sitting on realized ones.

I'm opening with this story because gold and silver investors are living through their own drawdown right now, and the lesson transfers directly. Gold closed Friday around $4,040, roughly 28 percent below its January peak of $5,597. Silver has taken the harder hit, trading near $58 after touching $121.62 in late January, a drop of roughly 53 percent. Six months in, plenty of readers are asking whether the bull market is over and when this drawdown is going to end.

To answer those questions, let’s look at what happened inside the two previous secular bull markets in the metals, because both contained drawdowns that looked a lot like this one, and both punished anyone who couldn't afford to sit through them.

Gold's current decline (bright gold) tracked against the 1975-76 and 2008 corrections, all measured from their peaks.

Start with the 1970s. Gold rose from $41 in September 1971 to $835 in January 1980, a gain of roughly 1,900 percent. Collecting that gain meant sitting through misery. In 1973, gold fell 28 percent over five months. The brutal one came in 1975 and 1976, when gold dropped 46 percent over 20 months, from $193 down to $104. It took nearly three and a half years to make a new high. Anyone who sold at that bottom missed the trade of the decade, because gold rose 700 percent from that trough to the 1980 peak.

Silver's version was uglier. It fell 44 percent in 1974 and needed five years to reclaim its old high. From that low of $3.79, it eventually ran to $49.45, a 13-fold gain.

Silver's current decline (white) against 1974 and 2008. The 1974 line runs five years before touching a new high.

The 2001 to 2011 bull told the same story with smaller numbers. Gold fell 22 percent in five weeks in 2006, then 29 percent during the 2008 financial crisis, sliding from $1,002 to $710 over eight months. It needed about 18 months to reach a new high, then climbed another 167 percent to $1,897. Silver got hit repeatedly, dropping 33 percent in 2004 and 35 percent in 2006 before the big one in 2008, a 57 percent washout from $20.75 to $8.95. From that low it gained more than 440 percent, peaking at $48.41 in April 2011.

Both gold bulls spent most of their lives below a prior peak (shaded). The gains came in short bursts between long corrections.

The data shows two consistent patterns. On depth, every major bull market in the metals has included at least one gold drawdown of 25 percent or more, while silver's mid-cycle drawdowns have routinely reached 40 to 57 percent. Today's pullback sits inside both of those historical ranges.

Every major drawdown inside a metals bull market since 1970, ranked by depth. Bright bars are today's.

On duration, the peak-to-trough phase of past corrections ran anywhere from five weeks to 20 months, and the full round trip back to new highs took between seven months and five years. Six months in, this correction isn't unusually long by historical standards.

Depth against time to trough. The 2026 stars sit inside the historical cluster on both measures.

Each time, the mid-cycle corrections bottomed while the underlying drivers, currency debasement in the 1970s and negative real rates in the 2000s, stayed in place.

In 2026, Central banks are still buying, silver is still running significant supply deficits, and real rates remain the swing factor as the Fed debates its next move.

Gains from the deepest mid-bull troughs to the eventual bull market peaks. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

I believe we're in a secular bull market bigger than either of the two above, with the most substantial gains still ahead of us. And that belief is precisely why I talk about risk management so often. The data makes the price of admission clear. Both previous bulls handed their largest gains only to investors who sat through declines of 25 to 57 percent along the way.

Realizing the gains ahead means getting through the drawdowns between here and there with your capital and your conviction intact. That's the part Aschenbrenner's lenders took away from him. That's not caution for its own sake. That’s the entire game.

One more thing before Sunday wraps up. This week I had a fascinating email from an INSIDER subscriber in Toronto, and on Tuesday I’m going to be featuring his story of how he's handling risk in this bull market. It's a practical, first-hand account and it pairs well with today's history lesson. See you then.

📦 Recommended Resources
Here are some of the companies I personally use and recommend:

Allocated Storage - BullionVault

🇨🇦 🇺🇸 Physical Delivery - Silver Gold Bull, Sprott Money

🔒 Every chart in today's newsletter has a hidden condition. You had to still be holding.

The 700% recovery after 1976 and the 441% silver run after 2008 only went to investors who made it to the lows with their capital and their nerve intact. Leopold Aschenbrenner's fund owned the right stocks this month but his lenders sold them anyway.

You can't control how deep this drawdown goes. But you can control whether you're forced to realize it - and whether you're still standing when the turn comes.

That's the job GoldBuzz INSIDER's Min Risk signals were built for: four years of research, over 50 years of data, one purpose - keeping members' capital out of the deepest parts of drawdowns like this one so they can realize the subsequent gains.

Since the signals flipped bearish on the miners in March, GDX has fallen 28%. The investors who sidestep the worst of a decline are the ones with dry powder and a clear head at the bottom of it.

History pays the survivors. Our members check one page each morning before the open to make sure they're among them.

14-day money-back guarantee. Cancel anytime.

That’s all for this Sunday, folks. See you on Tuesday.

Before you go, please take a moment to rate today’s newsletter and tell us how we did.

What did you think of today's GoldBuzz?

Takes 2 seconds and helps us improve!

Login or Subscribe to participate

The Gold Awakening Download Your Free Copy Here

Enjoyed today's issue? Forward it to a friend who needs more gold in their life. They can subscribe at goldbuzz.com

Got feedback? Hit reply and let me know what you loved (or didn't).

Rick Adams
Founder, GoldBuzz
rick@goldbuzz.com

Keep Reading